The Green Children of Woolpit.

Original Link: http://shadowheartandsouloftheblackrose.ning.com/group/fairies-and-other-magickal-beings/forum/topic/show?id=6431585%3ATopic%3A204356&xg_source=msg

 

Konstantin_Makovsky-woolpitThe legend of the green children of Woolpit concerns two children of unusual skin colour who reportedly appeared in the village of Woolpit in Suffolk, England, some time in the 12th century, perhaps during the reign of King Stephen.
The children, brother and sister, were of generally normal appearance except for the green colour of their skin. They spoke in an unknown language, and the only food they would eat was beans. Eventually they learned to eat other food and lost their green pallor, but the boy was sickly and died soon after he and his sister were baptised.
 
The girl adjusted to her new life, but she was considered to be “rather loose and wanton in her conduct”. After she learned to speak English, the girl explained that she and her brother had come from St Martin’s Land, an underground world inhabited by green people.The only near-contemporary accounts are contained in William of Newburgh’s Historia rerum Anglicarum and Ralph of Coggeshall’s Chronicum Anglicanum, written in about 1189 and 1220 respectively. Between then and their rediscovery in the mid-19th century, the green children seem to surface only in a passing mention in William Camden’s Britannia in 1586, and in Bishop Francis Godwin’s fantastical The Man in the Moone, in both of which William of Newburgh’s account is cited.
 
Two approaches have dominated explanations of the story of the green children: that it is a folk tale describing an imaginary encounter with the inhabitants of another world, perhaps one beneath our feet or even extraterrestrial, or it is a garbled account of a historical event.
The story was praised as an ideal fantasy by the English anarchist poet and critic Herbert Read in his English Prose Style, published in 1931. It provided the inspiration for his only novel, The Green Child, written in 1934.SourcesThe village of Woolpit is in the county of Suffolk, East Anglia, about 7 miles (11 km) east of the town of Bury St Edmunds. During the Middle Ages it belonged to the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds, and was part of one of the most densely populated areas in rural England.
 
Two writers, Ralph of Coggeshall (died c. 1226) and William of Newburgh (c. 1136–1198), reported on the sudden and unexplained arrival in the village of two green children during one summer in the 12th century. Ralph was the abbot of a Cistercian monastery at Coggeshall, about 26 miles (42 km) south of Woolpit. William was a canon at the Augustinian Newburgh Priory, far to the north in Yorkshire. William states that the account given in his Historia rerum Anglicarum (c. 1189) is based on “reports from a number of trustworthy sources”; Ralph’s account in his Chronicum Anglicanum, written some time during the 1220s, incorporates information from Sir Richard de Calne of Wykes, who reportedly gave the green children refuge in his manor, 6 miles (9.7 km) to the north of Woolpit.
The accounts given by the two authors differ in some details.StoryOne day at harvest time, according to William of Newburgh during the reign of King Stephen (1135–1154), the villagers of Woolpit discovered two children, a brother and sister, beside one of the wolf pits that gave the village its name. Their skin was green, they spoke an unknown language, and their clothing was unfamiliar.
Ralph reports that the children were taken to the home of Richard de Calne. Ralph and William agree that the pair refused all food for several days until they came across some raw beans, which they consumed eagerly.
The children gradually adapted to normal food and in time lost their green colour. The boy, who appeared to be the younger of the two, became sickly and died shortly after he and his sister were baptised.After learning to speak English, the children – Ralph says just the surviving girl – explained that they came from a land where the sun never shone and the light was like twilight.
William says the children called their home St Martin’s Land; Ralph adds that everything there was green. According to William, the children were unable to account for their arrival in Woolpit; they had been herding their father’s cattle when they heard a loud noise (according to William, the bells of Bury St Edmunds) and suddenly found themselves by the wolf pit where they were found. Ralph says that they had become lost when they followed the cattle into a cave and, after being guided by the sound of bells, eventually emerged into our land.
According to Ralph, the girl was employed for many years as a servant in Richard de Calne’s household, where she was considered to be “very wanton and impudent”. William says that she eventually married a man from King’s Lynn, about 40 miles (64 km) from Woolpit, where she was still living shortly before he wrote. Based on his research into Richard de Calne’s family history, the astronomer and writer Duncan Lunan has concluded that the girl was given the name “Agnes” and that she married a royal official named Richard Barre.ExplanationsNeither Ralph of Coggeshall nor William of Newburgh offer an explanation for the “strange and prodigious” event, as William calls it, and some modern historians have the same reticence: “I consider the process of worrying over the suggestive details of these wonderfully pointless miracles in an effort to find natural or psychological explanations of what ‘really,’ if anything, happened, to be useless to the study of William of Newburgh or, for that matter, of the Middle Ages”, says Nancy Partner, author of a study of 12th-century historiography.
 
Nonetheless, such explanations continue to be sought and two approaches have dominated explanations of the mystery of the green children. The first is that it is a folk tale, describing an imaginary encounter with the inhabitants of a “fairy Otherworld”. The second is that it is a garbled account of a real event, although it is impossible to be certain whether the story as recorded is an authentic report given by the children or an “adult invention”. His study of accounts of children and servants fleeing from their masters led Charles Oman to conclude that “there is clearly some mystery behind it all [the story of the green children], some story of drugging and kidnapping”.
Folklore explanations Scholars such as Charles Oman note that one element of the children’s account, the entry into a different reality by way of a cave, seems to have been quite popular. Gerald of Wales tells a similar story of a boy who, after escaping his master, “encountered two pigmies who led him through an underground passage into a beautiful land with fields and rivers, but not lit by the full light of the sun”. But as a folk tale the story is rather rare; E. W. Baughman lists it as the only example of his F103.1 category of English and North American folk tales: “Inhabitants of lower world visit mortals, and continue to live with them”.
Martin Walsh considers the references to St Martin to be significant, and sees the story of the green children as evidence that the feast of Martinmas has its origins in an English aboriginal past, of which the children’s story forms “the lowest stratum”. E. S. Alderson suggests a Celtic connection in a 1900 edition of Notes and Queries: ” ‘Green’ spirits are ‘sinless’ in Celtic literature and tradition … It may be more than a coincidence that the green girl marries a ‘man of [Kings] Lynn.’ Here the original [Celtic word] would be lein, evil, i.e. the pure fairy marries a sinful child of earth.”Jeffrey Jerome Cohen proposes that the story is about racial difference, and “allows William to write obliquely about the Welsh”: the green children are a memory of England’s past and the violent conquest of the indigenous Britons by the Anglo-Saxons followed by the Norman invasion.
William of Newburgh reluctantly includes the story of the green children in his account of a largely unified England, which Cohen juxtaposes with Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain, a book that according to William is full of “gushing and untrammeled lying”. Geoffrey’s history offers accounts of previous kings and kingdoms of various racial identities, whereas William’s England is one in which all peoples are either assimilated (in the case of the Normans) or pushed to the boundaries (the Welsh, the Scots, and the Picts). According to Cohen, the green children represent a dual intrusion into William’s unified vision of England. On one hand they are a reminder of the racial and cultural differences between Normans and Anglo-Saxons, especially because of the children’s claim to have come from St Martin’s Land, named after Martin of Tours; the only other time William mentions that saint is in reference to St Martin’s Abbey in Hastings, which commemorates the Norman victory in 1066. But the children also embody the earlier inhabitants of the British Isles, the “Welsh (and Irish and Scots) who [had been] forcibly anglicized … The Green Children resurface another story that William had been unable to tell, one in which English paninsular dominion becomes a troubled assumption rather than a foregone conclusion.” The boy in particular, who dies rather than become assimilated, represents “an adjacent world that cannot be annexed … an otherness that will perish to endure”.
Illustration of the abandoned Babes in the Wood by Randolph Caldecott, 1879In a modern development of the tale the green children are associated with the Babes in the Wood, who were left by their wicked uncle to die; in this version the children’s green colouration is explained by their having been poisoned with arsenic.
Fleeing from the wood in which they were abandoned, possibly nearby Thetford Forest, the children fell into the pits at Woolpit where they were discovered. Local author and folk singer Bob Roberts states in his 1978 book A Slice of Suffolk that “I was told there are still people in Woolpit who are ‘descended from the green children’, but nobody would tell me who they were!”Other commentators have suggested that the children may have been aliens, or inhabitants of a world beneath the Earth. In a 1996 article published in the magazine Analog, astronomer Duncan Lunan hypothesised that the children were accidentally transported to Woolpit from their home planet as the result of a “matter transmitter” malfunction. Lunan suggests that the planet from which the children were expelled may be trapped in synchronous orbit around its sun, presenting the conditions for life only in a narrow twilight zone between a fiercely hot surface and a frozen dark side. He explains the children’s green colouration as a side effect of consuming the genetically modified alien plants eaten by the planet’s inhabitants.
Lunan was not the first to state that the green children may have been extraterrestrials. Robert Burton suggested in his 1621 The Anatomy of Melancholy that the green children “fell from Heaven”, an idea that seems to have been picked up by Francis Godwin, historian and Bishop of Hereford, in his speculative fiction The Man in the Moone, published posthumously in 1638.Historical explanationsMany Flemish immigrants arrived in eastern England during the 12th century, and they were persecuted after Henry II became king in 1154; a large number of them were killed near Bury St Edmunds in 1173 at the Battle of Fornham fought between Henry II and Robert de Beaumont, 3rd Earl of Leicester. Paul Harris has suggested that the green children’s Flemish parents perished during a period of civil strife and that the children may have come from the village of Fornham St Martin, slightly to the north of Bury St Edmunds, where a settlement of Flemish fullers existed at that time. They may have fled and ultimately wandered to Woolpit. Disoriented, bewildered, and dressed in unfamiliar Flemish clothes, the children would have presented a very strange spectacle to the Woolpit villagers. The children’s colour could be explained by green sickness, the result of a dietary deficiency.
Brian Haughton considers Harris’s explanation to be plausible, and the one most widely accepted, although not without its difficulties. For instance, he suggests it is unlikely that an educated local man like Richard de Calne would not have recognised the language spoken by the children as being Flemish.
Author:Rev. JP Vanir
Published:Sep 3rd
Modified:Sep 3rd

Who is Online?
Help Us or Contact us:

Contact Rev. JP Vanir at:

jp.vanir@templeuvup.network,

jp.vanir@vampyrian.org,

or revjpvanir@gmail.com

SITE PLAYLIST







2261164 com wheelofthe

Website Fund
NETWORK CHATS BELOW Every wednesday after 7pm to 10pm


Vampyrian TempleUVUP Discord Chat









Network Poll
Most Active Members
Rev. JP Vanir
Recent Activity Items: 7
LadyMindee
Recent Activity Items: 4
MOONTAN
Recent Activity Items: 2
TheUVUP
Recent Activity Items: 1
nox_lumen
Recent Activity Items: 1
Events
There are no upcoming events
Shouts
9/30/2017
Oriel: Hi all Check out the themes group
10/21/2016
Lilitha Vain: We love to hear your thoughts. Post a shout today!
9/13/2016
Lilitha Vain: Hello all!!! Hope you guys are enjoying your time here! <333
8/2/2016
Oriel: Just poppin in to do some lite reading
7/31/2016
Lilitha Vain: I am one of the top four most active members of the whole site! WOOT!!! Go me! Go me! Go, go, go meee!!! ^_^
7/3/2016
Rev. JP Vanir: Don't forget to keep updated
5/18/2016
Codec: Hello everyone!
5/3/2016
snowicewitch: Hi I'm new
3/28/2016
Oriel: What wonderful work you have all done on this site!JP-such wonderful organization!
1/2/2016
Lilitha Vain: Hey everyone, I've posted some threads in the Games Section of our forum. Check it out and start posting today!!!
12/31/2015
Rev. JP Vanir: Have A Happy New Year everyone
12/28/2015
Lilitha Vain: Hey everyone, I'm back!!! <3
12/16/2015
Rev. JP Vanir: Don't forget to add to the forum and wiki
Login or Join our website to post.

Live Support